Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Erwin v. Ahlin, 1:18-cv-00050-LJO-SAB (PC). (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190211861 Visitors: 22
Filed: Feb. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION TO DISMISS AND DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THIS MATTER (ECF No. 35, 38) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff Joey Erwin, a civil detainee, is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint in this action on January 11, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) This action is currently proceeding on the first amended complaint, filed March 26, 2018, against
More

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION TO DISMISS AND DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THIS MATTER

(ECF No. 35, 38)

Plaintiff Joey Erwin, a civil detainee, is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint in this action on January 11, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) This action is currently proceeding on the first amended complaint, filed March 26, 2018, against Defendants Pam Ahlin and Brandon Price. (ECF Nos. 9, 12.) Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on August 30, 2018. (ECF No. 21.) On January 24, 2019, Plaintiff filed an ex parte motion to dismiss this action. (ECF No. 35.) Pursuant to a court order, Defendants filed a statement of non-opposition to dismissing this action without prejudice. (ECF No. 38.)

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may dismiss an action by filing a motion requesting the Court to dismiss the action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) is addressed to the sound discretion of the district court. Hamilton v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. Inc., 679 F.2d 143, 145 (9th Cir. 1982).

Here, Plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this action; and Defendants have no objection to dismissal of the action without prejudice. Accordingly, the Court shall grant Plaintiff's request for dismissal of this action.

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. All pending dates and matters are VACATED;

2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer