ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff, who proceeds without counsel, has moved to modify the scheduling order and amend the filing date in this Social Security appeal. (ECF No. 15.) The motion is set for hearing on March 6, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned, and plaintiff has requested to appear telephonically. (Id.) Upon review of plaintiff's briefing and the record in this matter, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT FINDS AS FOLLOWS:

According to plaintiff, "the court issued a scheduling order based on a denied claim for disability benefits" even though her complaint "challenges a decision . . . denying Plaintiff's Supplemental Security Income." (ECF No. 15 at 1.) Plaintiff maintains that the scheduling order needs to be amended because of this purported error. (Id.) There is no need to amend the scheduling order, however, as it simply includes generic language used in the scheduling of Social Security appeals before the undersigned, regardless of whether the individual appeal pertains to Disability Insurance Benefits or Supplemental Security Income. (See ECF No. 5.) Indeed, the Commissioner of Social Security has already answered the complaint and lodged the administrative transcript (see ECF Nos. 12, 13), demonstrating that the Commissioner did not misunderstand what type of case this is. Thus, there is no cause to amend the scheduling order.

As to the filing date of this action, plaintiff claims that her complaint has been stamped "July" even though she filed the complaint on August 10, 2018. (ECF No. 15 at 1.) However, a review of the docket reveals that the complaint was filed, and indeed stamped as filed, on August 10, 2018. (ECF No. 1 at 1.)

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: