Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fugawa v. DeArmond, 1:11-cv-00966-LJO-SKO (PC). (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190215813 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL AND DEFENSE COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER (Doc. 103) TEN (10) DAY DEADLINE SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Peter Fugawa, is a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On December 11, 2018, this action proceeded to a settlement conference which resulted in a settlement. (Doc. 103.) The Court ordered dismi
More

ORDER TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL AND DEFENSE COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER

(Doc. 103)

TEN (10) DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff, Peter Fugawa, is a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 11, 2018, this action proceeded to a settlement conference which resulted in a settlement. (Doc. 103.) The Court ordered dismissal documents to be filed within sixty (60) days. The allowed time has now lapsed, and dismissal documents have not been filed.

Thus, it is HEREBY ORDERED that, within ten (10) days of the date of service of this order, the parties SHALL show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the Court's order. Alternatively, they may file dismissal documents within the same time frame.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer