Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Velez v. Bakken, 2:17-cv-00960-WBS-KJN. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190215867 Visitors: 30
Filed: Feb. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between Plaintiffs HARRY VELEZ (through successor in interest Andre O'Hara), MARIA LOZADA, ANDRE O'HARA, Z.J. (through guardian ad litem Timothy Zimmerman), R.C. (through guardian ad litem Chrisy Ulloa), F.M. (through guardian ad litem Natasha Finck), H.V.J. (through guardian ad litem Natasha Finck), L.E. (through guardian ad litem Kristin Stillma
More

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between Plaintiffs HARRY VELEZ (through successor in interest Andre O'Hara), MARIA LOZADA, ANDRE O'HARA, Z.J. (through guardian ad litem Timothy Zimmerman), R.C. (through guardian ad litem Chrisy Ulloa), F.M. (through guardian ad litem Natasha Finck), H.V.J. (through guardian ad litem Natasha Finck), L.E. (through guardian ad litem Kristin Stillman-Gendron), and Defendants ROBERT BAKKEN, DUSTIN MARIA, and COUNTY OF TEHAMA, that this action be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that each party is to bear their own fees and costs, including all attorneys' fees.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer