Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McFadden v. Fidelity Brokerage SVS, 2:18-cv-2193 MCE DB PS. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190215888 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Julianna McFadden, is proceeding pro se in this action. Therefore, the matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Noticed for hearing before the undersigned on February 22, 2019, is defendant Fidelity Brokerage Services' motion to compel arbitration and stay these proceedings. (ECF No. 18.) However, on February 8, 2019, plaintiff filed a statement of non-opposition to defenda
More

ORDER

Plaintiff, Julianna McFadden, is proceeding pro se in this action. Therefore, the matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Noticed for hearing before the undersigned on February 22, 2019, is defendant Fidelity Brokerage Services' motion to compel arbitration and stay these proceedings. (ECF No. 18.) However, on February 8, 2019, plaintiff filed a statement of non-opposition to defendant's motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The February 22, 2019 hearing of defendant's motion is vacated;

2. Defendant's unopposed November 28, 2018 motion to compel arbitration and stay these proceedings (ECF No. 9) is granted;

3. This action is stayed pending arbitration before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority;

4. Within thirty days of the completion of arbitration proceedings, the parties shall file status reports advising the court as to the outcome of the arbitration and whether this action should continue; and

5. The Clerk of the Court shall administratively close this case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer