MacDowell v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:19-cv-00065-AC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190221b43
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . On January 9, 2019, plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, filed a deficient application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). ECF No. 2. On January 16, 2019, the court gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended IFP application. ECF No. 3. Though plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation of dismissal for failure to prosecute, he did not timely file an amended IFP application. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . On January 9, 2019, plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, filed a deficient application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). ECF No. 2. On January 16, 2019, the court gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended IFP application. ECF No. 3. Though plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation of dismissal for failure to prosecute, he did not timely file an amended IFP application. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY O..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
On January 9, 2019, plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, filed a deficient application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). ECF No. 2. On January 16, 2019, the court gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended IFP application. ECF No. 3. Though plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation of dismissal for failure to prosecute, he did not timely file an amended IFP application. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, within 14 days, why his failure to file an amended IFP application should not result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of an amended IFP application within this timeframe will serve as cause and will discharge this order. If plaintiff fails to respond, the court will recommend dismissal of his case pursuant to Local Civil Rule 110.
Source: Leagle
