Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Tenorio v. Gallardo, 1:16-cv-00283 DAD JLT. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190225678 Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Judge Dale A. Drozd ordered the parties to contact the Court to schedule a settlement conference. They have done this and agreed upon a date for the conference. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 1. The settlement conference is scheduled for March 12, 2019 at 1:30 p.m., located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California; 2. Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall
More

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

Judge Dale A. Drozd ordered the parties to contact the Court to schedule a settlement conference. They have done this and agreed upon a date for the conference. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. The settlement conference is scheduled for March 12, 2019 at 1:30 p.m., located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California;

2. Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority to negotiate and settle the case on any reasonable terms1discussed at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.

3. No later than Wednesday, February 26, 2019, the plaintiffs SHALL submit to the defendant via fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful2 settlement demand which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate;

4. No later March 4,2019, the defendant SHALL respond via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate.

5. If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall not be filed on the court docket.

A. CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

No later than March 8, 2019, the parties shall submit, directly to Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to JLTOrders@caed.uscourts.gov, a Confidential Settlement Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

A. A brief statement of the facts of the case. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.

C. A summary of the proceedings to date.

D. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.

E. The relief sought.

F. The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of past settlement discussions, offers and demands. They SHALL include a discussion of why they believe the case is now in a settlement posture and why they believe the case can settle now, despite the unwillingness of the parties to settle at the time of the last settlement conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like may be represented by a person whose recommendations about settlement are relied upon by the ultimate decision makers.
2. "Meaningful" means the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering party. "Meaningful" does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If, however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing the settlement conference via stipulation.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer