Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cox v. Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC, 1:17-cv-01056-DAD-BAM (consolidated). (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190226898 Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE NON-PARTY DEPOSITION AFTER NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC, T.G.S. Transportation, Inc., and Mr. Jeffrey Cox (collectively, the "Parties") hereby jointly ask that the Court grant leave for Roadrunner to conduct a deposition of non-party Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. ("Expeditors") on March 8, 2019, after the discovery cutoff set in the Court's May 25, 2018, Scheduling Conf
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE NON-PARTY DEPOSITION AFTER NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF

Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC, T.G.S. Transportation, Inc., and Mr. Jeffrey Cox (collectively, the "Parties") hereby jointly ask that the Court grant leave for Roadrunner to conduct a deposition of non-party Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. ("Expeditors") on March 8, 2019, after the discovery cutoff set in the Court's May 25, 2018, Scheduling Conference Order (the "Order") (ECF No. 111). In support of this Joint Stipulation, the Parties state as follows:

1. On May 25, 2018, the Court issued the Order, establishing February 22, 2019, as the cutoff for non-expert discovery.

2. On December 4, 2018, Roadrunner served the "Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action" ("Subpoena") attached hereto as Exhibit A on Expeditors—setting a deposition of Expeditors for January 17, 2019, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6).

3. On January 3, 2019, Expeditors served Responses to Roadrunner's Subpoena and accompanying Requests for Production of Documents, in which Expeditors indicated that it was not available to appear and give testimony on the date set in the Subpoena.

4. Roadrunner and Expeditors, thereafter, met and conferred on Expeditors' availability to appear and give testimony on a date before the non-expert discovery cutoff set in the Order and tentatively agreed to reschedule Expeditors' deposition for a date in the week of February 4, 2019.

5. On January 22, 2019, Expeditors' counsel informed Roadrunner's counsel that she had been in an accident, suffered a fractured ankle that required surgery tentatively scheduled for January 25, 2019, and would be limited in her ability to travel for a period of weeks after surgery. Counsel also indicated that no other attorney was able to appear on behalf of Expeditors.

6. Expeditor's counsel, therefore, requested that Expeditors' deposition be rescheduled for March 8, 2019—after the non-expert discovery cutoff set in the Order.

7. Roadrunner informed Expeditors it would agree to a March 8, 2019, deposition, and requested that Expeditors confirm TGS and Mr. Cox's agreement.

8. On January 24, 2019, Expeditors' counsel emailed TGS and Mr. Cox's counsel and requested that they agree to a March 8, 2019, deposition in light of the circumstances, and counsel for TGS and Mr. Cox each indicated their agreement via emails sent later that same day.

9. Accordingly, the Parties, and Expeditors, are in agreement to hold the deposition of Expeditors on March 8, 2019, or on another date as mutually agreed on between all Parties after the February 22, 2019 deadline, and therefore, seek a Court Order permitting that deposition to occur after the non-expert discovery cutoff set in the Scheduling Conference Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing, Roadrunner's request for leave to conduct a deposition of non-party Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. on March 8, 2019, or on another date as mutually agreed on between all parties in March 2019, after the non-expert discovery deadline set in the Court's Scheduling Conference Order is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer