Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Martinez v. City of West Sacramento, 2:16-CV-02566-TLN-EFB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190227b15 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANT DANIEL T. ZWICKY'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED PLEADING TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . STIPULATION AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant Daniel T. Zwicky, and subject to Court approval, that Defendant Zwicky shall not be required to file an Answer or other responsive pleading at this time. Plaintiffs and Defendant Zwicky shall file a stipulation and proposed order on or before March 6, 2019, regarding the timi
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANT DANIEL T. ZWICKY'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED PLEADING

STIPULATION AND ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant Daniel T. Zwicky, and subject to Court approval, that Defendant Zwicky shall not be required to file an Answer or other responsive pleading at this time. Plaintiffs and Defendant Zwicky shall file a stipulation and proposed order on or before March 6, 2019, regarding the timing of Defendant Zwicky's Answer or other responsive pleading. The reasons for this stipulation are as follows:

1. On March 30, 2017, Defendant Zwicky moved to dismiss the original Complaint.

2. On October 27, 2017, Plaintiffs moved to amend the Complaint and lodged a proposed First Amended Complaint ("FAC").

3. On February 5, 2019, the Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiffs' motion to amend, and denied Defendant Zwicky's motion to dismiss as moot. The Court granted Plaintiffs 30 days to file any additional motion to amend.

4. Plaintiffs are still considering whether to file an additional motion to amend regarding the claims alleged against Defendant Zwicky. Plaintiffs anticipate that they will make a determination on or before March 6, 2019.

5. Whether Plaintiffs file an additional motion to amend or proceed with the FAC (as modified by the Court's Order, ECF No. 69), Plaintiffs will provide Defendant Zwicky with at least 30 days to file a response after they make their determination.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer