Ramos v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00060-DMC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190228839
Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a thirty (30) day extension of time until March 25, 2019, in which to e-file her Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on or before April 24, 2019. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's schedule of administrative hearing and district court briefs due (thirtee
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a thirty (30) day extension of time until March 25, 2019, in which to e-file her Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on or before April 24, 2019. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's schedule of administrative hearing and district court briefs due (thirteen..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a thirty (30) day extension of time until March 25, 2019, in which to e-file her Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on or before April 24, 2019. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's schedule of administrative hearing and district court briefs due (thirteen opening briefs and two reply briefs due). Plaintiff makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Defendant has no objection and has stipulated to the requested relief.
IT IS ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
