Jones v. Jimenez, 1:14-cv-02045-DAD-SAB (PC). (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190301a69
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 129] STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Jeremy Jones is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On February 25, 2019, Plaintiff filed a response to Defendant's reply to Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 129.) The Court construes this filing as a surreply. No further br
Summary: ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 129] STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Jeremy Jones is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On February 25, 2019, Plaintiff filed a response to Defendant's reply to Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 129.) The Court construes this filing as a surreply. No further bri..
More
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ECF No. 129]
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Jeremy Jones is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On February 25, 2019, Plaintiff filed a response to Defendant's reply to Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 129.) The Court construes this filing as a surreply. No further briefing on Defendant's motion for summary judgment is permitted absent leave of court. The Court did not grant Plaintiff leave to file a surreply, and no further briefing on the motion is warranted. Accordingly, Plaintiff's surreply (ECF No. 129) is HEREBY STRICKEN from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
