Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Renteria v. Maldonado, 1:17-CV-1451-LJO-JLT (PC). (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190304584 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER REFERRING THE CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT, SETTLEMENT WEEK, AND STAYING THE CASE FOR 90 DAYS JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . When at least one defendant has been served, the Court is referring all post-screening, civil rights cases filed by pro se inmates to the Post-Screening Alternative Dispute Resolution Project to attempt to resolve cases more quickly and less expensively. Defense counsel from the Office of the California Attorney General has agreed to participate
More

ORDER REFERRING THE CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT, SETTLEMENT WEEK, AND STAYING THE CASE FOR 90 DAYS

When at least one defendant has been served, the Court is referring all post-screening, civil rights cases filed by pro se inmates to the Post-Screening Alternative Dispute Resolution Project to attempt to resolve cases more quickly and less expensively. Defense counsel from the Office of the California Attorney General has agreed to participate in this pilot project. No defenses or objections are waived by participation.

As set forth in the screening order, the Court has found the plaintiff has stated at least one cognizable civil rights claim. Thus, the Court STAYS this action for 90 days to allow the parties to investigate the plaintiff's claims, meet and confer and participate in a settlement conference.

There is a presumption that all post-screening civil rights cases assigned to the undersigned will proceed to settlement conference.1 However, if after investigating plaintiff's claims and speaking with plaintiff, and after conferring with defense counsel's supervisor, counsel finds in good faith that a settlement conference would be a waste of resources2, defense counsel may move to opt out of this pilot project.3

Within 35 days, the assigned Deputy Attorney General SHALL contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov, to schedule the settlement conference. If the settlement conference cannot be set quickly due to the court's calendar, the parties may seek an extension of the initial 90-day stay.

Based upon the foregoing, the Court ORDERS:

1. This action is STAYED for 90 days to allow the parties an opportunity to settle their dispute before a responsive pleading is filed, or the discovery process begins. No other pleadings or other documents may be filed in this case during the stay. The parties SHALL NOT engage in formal discovery, but they may jointly agree to engage in informal discovery.

2. Within 30 days from the date of this order, the parties SHALL file the attached notice, indicating their agreement to proceed to an early settlement conference or whether they believe settlement is not achievable at this time. In addition, they SHALL indicate whether they object to the undersigned conducting the settlement conference.

3. Within 35 days from the date of this order, the assigned Deputy Attorney General SHALL contact this court's Courtroom Deputy Clerk at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov, to schedule the settlement conference;

4. If the parties settle their case during the stay of this action, they SHALL file a Notice of Settlement as required by Local Rule 160;

5. The Clerk of the Court SHALL serve via email, copies of: a. plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1), b. the screening order (Docs. 19, 21), and c. this order to Supervising Deputy Attorney General Christopher Becker, and copy of this order to ADR Coordinator Sujean Park;

6. The parties are reminded of their obligation to keep the court informed of any changes of addresses during the stay and while the action is pending. Changes of address must be reported promptly in a separate document entitled "Notice of Change of Address." See L.R. 182(f).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. If the case does not settle during the stay, Court will set a deadline for the responsive pleading at the conference.
2. By way of guidance, if the defense intends to file an exhaustion motion and believes in good faith that it has a significant chance of success, this would be a likely circumstance where the opt-out provision should be employed.
3. During the entire week of June 3-7, 2019, the Eastern District of California, Fresno and Sacramento Divisions, is hosting Settlement Week, during which judges will conduct settlement conferences. If the parties respond that a settlement conference will likely be beneficial, this action will be included in Settlement Week.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer