Rosiles v. Pfeiffer, 2:17-cv-2600 KJM GGH P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190308885
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . While it is understandable that petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed evidence in a reply brief, having been advised by respondent that he had no evidence justifying equitable tolling, it is unfair to respondent not to have a chance to respond to such evidence. Therefore, respondent has fourteen days in which to respond to the evidence submission. No further briefing is authorized unless and until a court order issues requesting such.
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
While it is understandable that petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed evidence in a reply brief, having been advised by respondent that he had no evidence justifying equitable tolling, it is unfair to respondent not to have a chance to respond to such evidence. Therefore, respondent has fourteen days in which to respond to the evidence submission. No further briefing is authorized unless and until a court order issues requesting such.
Source: Leagle
