Schenone v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-01655-AC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190308889
Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . [PROPOSED] ORDER For good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its response to Plaintiff's Motion on or before March 19, 2019. All other deadlines shall be exte
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . [PROPOSED] ORDER For good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its response to Plaintiff's Motion on or before March 19, 2019. All other deadlines shall be exten..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
For good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its response to Plaintiff's Motion on or before March 19, 2019. All other deadlines shall be extended accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
