Robinson v. Berryhill, 1:18-cv-0976-JLT. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190315992
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION (Doc. 12) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On March 13, 2019, the parties filed a "Stipulation of Dismissal," indicating the parties agreed that "this action be dismissed with prejudice." (Doc. 12 at 1) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Because all parties signed the stipulation, it "au
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION (Doc. 12) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On March 13, 2019, the parties filed a "Stipulation of Dismissal," indicating the parties agreed that "this action be dismissed with prejudice." (Doc. 12 at 1) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Because all parties signed the stipulation, it "aut..
More
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION (Doc. 12)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On March 13, 2019, the parties filed a "Stipulation of Dismissal," indicating the parties agreed that "this action be dismissed with prejudice." (Doc. 12 at 1) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared."
Because all parties signed the stipulation, it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
