Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

State Farm General Insurance Company v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 2:18-CV-00662-TLN-KJN. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190318880 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CERTAIN DISCOVERY AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . The parties hereto, Plaintiff STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Defendant SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., hereby stipulate that the current deadlines for fact and expert discovery be modified, and request that the Court issue an Order consistent with that Stipulation. This is the parties' second request to modify the discovery schedule. The reasons for the request are set f
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CERTAIN DISCOVERY AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES

The parties hereto, Plaintiff STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Defendant SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., hereby stipulate that the current deadlines for fact and expert discovery be modified, and request that the Court issue an Order consistent with that Stipulation. This is the parties' second request to modify the discovery schedule. The reasons for the request are set forth below.

The parties have been engaged in discovery. The parties have not yet completed discovery in this case because, based upon the information learned to date, the parties have hoped that this case could be resolved through settlement negotiations. Because of their interest in settlement, the pending discovery has not been completed as the parties have been attempting to preserve resources in favor of moving forward with settlement. (While the parties believe that further settlement negotiations can take place without the completion of the pending discovery, the parties believe that the pending discovery would be necessary if the case goes forward to trial.)

In light of the above, the parties have attempted to conduct meaningful settlement negotiations. The negotiations have been slow moving but steady. The negotiations are continuing to date. While the parties intend to continue to engage in negotiations, the parties believed it was important to apprise the Court of the status and to formally modify the existing pretrial deadlines regarding discovery and related conferences.

At this point in time, the parties continue to believe that negotiations can continue without the aid of any formal ADR services or a private mediator. However, the additional time requested herein will also provide time for such assistance if needed.

Additionally, the parties believe that they will not be bringing motions for summary judgment, which helps provide some modification to the original and current pretrial schedule.

For the above reasons, the parties respectfully request that the Court allow the parties to move the fact and expert discovery deadlines to the following new dates:

Fact discovery deadline: May 7, 20192 Expert discovery disclosure: May 30, 2019 Supplemental expert disclosure: June 28, 2019 Expert discovery deadline: July 31, 2019 Joint Notice of Trial Readiness: August 30, 2019

For the foregoing reasons, and good cause appearing, the parties request that the Court modify the Scheduling order as set forth herein. Of course, counsel for the parties are available to discuss these proposed modifications with the Court if the Court so wishes.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED:

The discovery deadlines in this case shall be modified as follows:

Fact discovery deadline: May 7, 2019 Expert discovery disclosure: May 30, 2019 Supplemental expert disclosure: June 28, 2019 Expert discovery deadline: July 31, 2019 Joint Notice of Trial Readiness: August 30, 2019

FootNotes


2. The prior fact discovery cut off was January 18, 2019, due to a prior stipulation and order. The prior expert disclosure date was January 30, 2019.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer