Madison v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-02692-AC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190318885
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g), AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . The parties stipulate by counsel to remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Upon remand, the administrative law judge (ALJ) will conduct further proceedings as necessary, provide Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing, and issue a de novo decision. The
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g), AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . The parties stipulate by counsel to remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Upon remand, the administrative law judge (ALJ) will conduct further proceedings as necessary, provide Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing, and issue a de novo decision. The p..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
The parties stipulate by counsel to remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Upon remand, the administrative law judge (ALJ) will conduct further proceedings as necessary, provide Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing, and issue a de novo decision. The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner.
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered.
Source: Leagle
