Diaz v. Chase Bank USA, N.A., 1:18-cv-01341-DAD-EPG. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190320990
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 45) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Alice Diaz, and Defendant Chase Bank (USA), N.A. ("Chase Bank"), have filed a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice all claims against Chase Bank. (ECF No. 45.) Pursuant to the stipulation, the case against Chase Bank has ended and the case is dismissed with prejudice only as to Chase Bank. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose,
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 45) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Alice Diaz, and Defendant Chase Bank (USA), N.A. ("Chase Bank"), have filed a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice all claims against Chase Bank. (ECF No. 45.) Pursuant to the stipulation, the case against Chase Bank has ended and the case is dismissed with prejudice only as to Chase Bank. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, ..
More
ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 45)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Alice Diaz, and Defendant Chase Bank (USA), N.A. ("Chase Bank"), have filed a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice all claims against Chase Bank. (ECF No. 45.) Pursuant to the stipulation, the case against Chase Bank has ended and the case is dismissed with prejudice only as to Chase Bank. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
