Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Medina v. Kernan, 1:19-cv-00345-DAD-JLT. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190320996 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER RECLASSIFYING CASE JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The events set forth in the complaint arose while the plaintiff was in custody and it raises claims related to the plaintiff's conditions of confinement. The defendants in this action include government employees and the State of California. Therefore, the Court ORDERS the matter to be reclassified as a "prisoner action." Despite this, however, the requirements of Local Rules 230(1), 240(c)(8) and 271(a)(2) SHALL NOT apply
More

ORDER RECLASSIFYING CASE

The events set forth in the complaint arose while the plaintiff was in custody and it raises claims related to the plaintiff's conditions of confinement. The defendants in this action include government employees and the State of California. Therefore, the Court ORDERS the matter to be reclassified as a "prisoner action." Despite this, however, the requirements of Local Rules 230(1), 240(c)(8) and 271(a)(2) SHALL NOT apply.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer