Hopson v. Lodi-California Glass Company, 2:18-cv-01764-KJM-DB. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190320a29
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . On February 28, 2019, the court issued a minute order instructing plaintiff to either (1) file a declaration as to the status of the case by March 14, 2019, or (2) file a motion for default judgment in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(19). See ECF No. 13. As of this order, plaintiff has failed to comply with the court's order and no further action has been taken to complete litigation in this action. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff sh
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . On February 28, 2019, the court issued a minute order instructing plaintiff to either (1) file a declaration as to the status of the case by March 14, 2019, or (2) file a motion for default judgment in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(19). See ECF No. 13. As of this order, plaintiff has failed to comply with the court's order and no further action has been taken to complete litigation in this action. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff sho..
More
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
On February 28, 2019, the court issued a minute order instructing plaintiff to either (1) file a declaration as to the status of the case by March 14, 2019, or (2) file a motion for default judgment in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(19). See ECF No. 13. As of this order, plaintiff has failed to comply with the court's order and no further action has been taken to complete litigation in this action.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff show cause within fourteen days of the date of this order why this case should not be dismissed for her failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
Source: Leagle
