Castaneda v. Sherman, 1:16-cv-01562-LJO-SKO (PC). (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190321a04
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Docs. 36, 43) SEVEN (7) DAY DEADLINE LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff, Jesus Bonilla Castaneda, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 20, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued Find
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Docs. 36, 43) SEVEN (7) DAY DEADLINE LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff, Jesus Bonilla Castaneda, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 20, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued Findi..
More
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Docs. 36, 43) SEVEN (7) DAY DEADLINE
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
Plaintiff, Jesus Bonilla Castaneda, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 20, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation to deny Defendants' motion to dismiss. (Doc. 43.) The Findings and Recommendation was served that same date and gave the parties twenty-one days to file objections. (Id.) Despite lapse of the time allowed, no objections have been filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the February 20, 2019 Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
Accordingly:
1. the Findings and Recommendation, issued on February 20, 2019 (Doc. 43), is adopted in full;
2. Defendants' motion to dismiss, filed on June 21, 2018, (Doc. 36), is denied; and
3. Defendants SHALL file an answer to the First Amended Complaint within seven (7) days of the date of service of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
