Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Eugenio v. Nationstar LLC, 2:16-cv-00302-MCE-EFB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190322a76 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION RE: DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, this Court issued a Memorandum and Order granting in part and denying part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 79. The Court gave Plaintiffs twenty (20) days — or until March 11, 2019 — to file an amended complaint, if desired. The Court did not specify a date certain for Defendants' responsive pleadings. WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agre
More

STIPULATION RE: DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE

WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, this Court issued a Memorandum and Order granting in part and denying part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 79. The Court gave Plaintiffs twenty (20) days — or until March 11, 2019 — to file an amended complaint, if desired. The Court did not specify a date certain for Defendants' responsive pleadings.

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agreed that Defendants will file a responsive pleading on or before April 1, 2019.

WHEREAS, Local Rule 143(b) and 144(b) provide that the parties may stipulate to extend or modify deadlines subject to the Court's approval of the stipulation;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and Defendants, on the other, through their respective counsel of record, subject to the Court's approval, that Defendants will file a response to the operative Second Amended Complaint no later than April 1, 2019.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer