Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Maciel-Jiminez, 1:19-CR-00033 LJO/SKO. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190401849 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE & ORDER SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . The Defendant, ERIK MACIEL-JIMINEZ, by and through his attorney of record, Jared M. Thompson, and the United States of America, by and through its attorney of record, Vincente Tennerelli, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The status conference in this matter is currently set for April 1, 2019, at 1:000 p.m. 2. The defense is still in the process of reviewing the Mr. Maciel-Jiminez's immigration file and
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE & ORDER

The Defendant, ERIK MACIEL-JIMINEZ, by and through his attorney of record, Jared M. Thompson, and the United States of America, by and through its attorney of record, Vincente Tennerelli, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. The status conference in this matter is currently set for April 1, 2019, at 1:000 p.m.

2. The defense is still in the process of reviewing the Mr. Maciel-Jiminez's immigration file and reviewing the contents of the file with him. Defense counsel requires additional time to complete its review of the discovery and to consult with his client, including discussions of possible plea negotiations.

3. The defense is requesting that Mr. Maciel-Jiminez's status conference be continued to May 20, 2019, at 1:00 p.m., or the next available date thereafter.

4. The United States has no objection to the requested continuance and the date selected. The parties agree that the time until the sentencing hearing be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act to preserve the interests of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The parties' request to continue the status conference currently set on April 1, 2019, at 1:00 p.m., to May 20, 2019, at 1:00 p.m., is GRANTED. Time is excluded through May 20, 2019, pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, for the reasons outlined in the Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer