Williams v. Hutson, 2:16-cv-1495 AC P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190401901
Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Defendants Miller and Hutson have each filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 55 (Miller motion), 58 (Hutson motion). Plaintiff has filed an opposition to defendant Miller's motion, ECF No. 66, but has not filed an opposition to defendant Hutson's separate motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall, within thirty days of the date
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Defendants Miller and Hutson have each filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 55 (Miller motion), 58 (Hutson motion). Plaintiff has filed an opposition to defendant Miller's motion, ECF No. 66, but has not filed an opposition to defendant Hutson's separate motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall, within thirty days of the date ..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants Miller and Hutson have each filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 55 (Miller motion), 58 (Hutson motion). Plaintiff has filed an opposition to defendant Miller's motion, ECF No. 66, but has not filed an opposition to defendant Hutson's separate motion.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall, within thirty days of the date of service of this order, file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant Hutson's motion for summary judgment filed August 14, 2018 (ECF No. 58).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
