Rios v. Gipson, 1:14-cv-00520-LJO-BAM (PC). (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190403c26
Visitors: 17
Filed: Apr. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS GIPSON, MAYO, PINA, ORTEGA, AND GARCIA TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Reno Fuentes Rios is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. This action currently proceeds on Plaintiff's second amended complaint against Defendants Gipson, Mayo, Pina, Ortega, and Garcia for improper gang validation in retaliation for fi
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS GIPSON, MAYO, PINA, ORTEGA, AND GARCIA TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Reno Fuentes Rios is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. This action currently proceeds on Plaintiff's second amended complaint against Defendants Gipson, Mayo, Pina, Ortega, and Garcia for improper gang validation in retaliation for fil..
More
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS GIPSON, MAYO, PINA, ORTEGA, AND GARCIA TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Reno Fuentes Rios is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action currently proceeds on Plaintiff's second amended complaint against Defendants Gipson, Mayo, Pina, Ortega, and Garcia for improper gang validation in retaliation for filing grievances in violation of the First Amendment.
On March 30, 2019, the Court granted Defendants' partial motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 47.) Accordingly, Defendants shall file an answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiff's second amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
