Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Spyksma v. Salida Chamber of Commerce, 1:18-cv-01116-BAM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190405c24 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION AND RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (Doc. No. 22) BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . On March 15, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation dismissing this action, with prejudice, and requesting that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of their settlement agreement. (Doc. No. 22.) Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, by operation of l
More

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION AND RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (Doc. No. 22)

On March 15, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation dismissing this action, with prejudice, and requesting that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of their settlement agreement. (Doc. No. 22.)

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, by operation of law without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). All pending dates and matters are VACATED. Each party is to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs incurred to date.

2. Notwithstanding the dismissal, the Court specifically retains jurisdiction through September 30, 2020, to enforce the terms of the parties' Confidential Settlement Agreement dated March 15, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer