Natural Resources Defense Council v. Bernhardt, 1:05-cv-01207 LJO-EPG. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190409929
Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RULING (ECF NOS. 1336 & 1337) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Before the Court for decision is the one paragraph motion for reconsideration filed by Defendant Intervenors, ECF No. 1336, joined (also in a one paragraph filing) by Federal Defendants. ECF No. 1337. Rather than directing the Court's attention to any reasons why the moving parties believe the magistrate judge's ruling was "clear error," see L.R. 303, t
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RULING (ECF NOS. 1336 & 1337) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Before the Court for decision is the one paragraph motion for reconsideration filed by Defendant Intervenors, ECF No. 1336, joined (also in a one paragraph filing) by Federal Defendants. ECF No. 1337. Rather than directing the Court's attention to any reasons why the moving parties believe the magistrate judge's ruling was "clear error," see L.R. 303, th..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RULING (ECF NOS. 1336 & 1337)
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
Before the Court for decision is the one paragraph motion for reconsideration filed by Defendant Intervenors, ECF No. 1336, joined (also in a one paragraph filing) by Federal Defendants. ECF No. 1337. Rather than directing the Court's attention to any reasons why the moving parties believe the magistrate judge's ruling was "clear error," see L.R. 303, the moving parties have simply string-cited every brief they previously filed on the matter. The Court has afforded this motion for reconsideration far more time and thought than did the moving parties. Having reviewed the magistrate judge's ruling in light of the record and applicable law, the motion is DENIED. See ECF Nos. 1311 & 1244; Fed. R. Civ. P. 45; U.S. Const., art. III, § 2.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
