Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dillingham v. Garcia, 1:18-cv-00579-LJO-EPG (PC). (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190411b45 Visitors: 25
Filed: Apr. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF NO. 30) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Jerry Dillingham ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On April 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 30). In the motion, Plaintiff references, among other documents, attached exhibits and an attached second amend
More

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(ECF NO. 30)

Jerry Dillingham ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On April 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 30). In the motion, Plaintiff references, among other documents, attached exhibits and an attached second amended complaint. However, the proposed second amended complaint is not attached, nor are any exhibits.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend is denied, without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling the motion with a signed copy of the proposed second amended complaint attached.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. On February 1, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a first amended complaint, along with a copy of the proposed amended complaint. (ECF Nos. 23 & 24). The Court has not yet ruled on this motion.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer