Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hughes v. City of Stockton, 2:18-CV-03188-JAM-DB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190411b74 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF STATE LAW CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY OF STOCKTON AND COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Pursuant to the stipulation of Plaintiff Corey Hughes, Defendant City of Stockton and Defendant County of San Joaquin, by and through their respective counsels of record, it is hereby ordered that: The Court GRANTS the parties stipulation to dismiss all of the Plaintiff's state law claims against Defendant City of Stockton and Defendant County of
More

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF STATE LAW CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY OF STOCKTON AND COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN

Pursuant to the stipulation of Plaintiff Corey Hughes, Defendant City of Stockton and Defendant County of San Joaquin, by and through their respective counsels of record, it is hereby ordered that:

The Court GRANTS the parties stipulation to dismiss all of the Plaintiff's state law claims against Defendant City of Stockton and Defendant County of San Joaquin only; and

The Court HEREBY ORDERS THE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT CITY OF STOCKTON AND DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN ONLY FROM THE OPERATIVE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 9):

Claim 2, Cal. Civil Code §52.1; Claim 3, Negligence/Negligent Hiring; and, Claim 4, Assault/Battery.

Defendants M. Rodriguez, Molthen, Abdallah, Wong and Garcia Jr. shall answer to the Second Amended Complaint on or before April 23, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer