Dodson v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:18-cv-1172-JLT. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190412799
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On April 10, 2019, Plaintiff filed a stipulation of the parties for Plaintiff to have an extension of thirty days to file her opening brief. (Doc. 16) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 3 at 4). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. The request for an extension of time (Doc. 16) is GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff SHALL file
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On April 10, 2019, Plaintiff filed a stipulation of the parties for Plaintiff to have an extension of thirty days to file her opening brief. (Doc. 16) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 3 at 4). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. The request for an extension of time (Doc. 16) is GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff SHALL file a..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On April 10, 2019, Plaintiff filed a stipulation of the parties for Plaintiff to have an extension of thirty days to file her opening brief. (Doc. 16) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 3 at 4). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:
1. The request for an extension of time (Doc. 16) is GRANTED; and
2. Plaintiff SHALL file an opening brief no later than May 16, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
