Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Cruz, 2:18-CR-180-JAM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190412810 Visitors: 22
Filed: Apr. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2019
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION REGARDING TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . STIPULATION 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on April 16, 2019. 2. By this stipulation, defendants now move to continue the status conference until May 14, 2019 at 9:15 a.m., and to exclude time between April 4, 2019, and May 14, 2019, under Local Code T4. 3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: a
More

AMENDED STIPULATION REGARDING TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER

STIPULATION

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on April 16, 2019.

2. By this stipulation, defendants now move to continue the status conference until May 14, 2019 at 9:15 a.m., and to exclude time between April 4, 2019, and May 14, 2019, under Local Code T4.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a) The government has represented that the discovery associated with this case includes investigative reports and photographs totaling approximately 250 pages. All of this discovery has been either produced directly to counsel and/or made available for inspection and copying.

b) Defense counsel requires additional time to review discovery produced by the United States, conduct their independent investigation into the facts and applicable law, interview witnesses, discuss with their respective clients potential pretrial resolution, and otherwise prepare their respective client's defense. These tasks are made much more difficult because each defendant's primary language is Spanish and an English/Spanish language interpreter is needed as an intermediary between counsel and client to accomplish many of these tasks, as well as to explain the indictment, any proposed plea agreement, any applicable sentencing guidelines, and Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 to each defendant.

c) In addition, Defense Counsel have proposed a global resolution that has been discussed with counsel for the government and additional time is required. Government counsel will be prepared to circulate proposed plea agreements prior to the requested Status date of May 14, 2019.

d) Counsel for defendants believe that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny them the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

e) The government does not object to the continuance.

f) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the time limits prescribed the Speedy Trial Act.

g) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C.§ 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period from the date of the parties' stipulation, April 4, 2019 to May 14, 2019, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at each defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

FINDINGS AND ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its Order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

The Court orders the time from the date of the parties' stipulation, April 4, 2019, up to and including the May 14, 2019, status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and General Order 479, Local Code T4, to allow defense counsel reasonable time necessary to prepare defense counsel's client's defense.

It is further ordered the April 16, 2019 status conference shall be continued until May 14, 2019, at 9:15 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer