Langston v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00658-DMC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190422a28
Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion Summary Judgment be extended from April 18, 2019 to April 22, 2019 . This is Defendant's fourth request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel for Defendant (Counsel) had a personal family emergency this week and was unexpect
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion Summary Judgment be extended from April 18, 2019 to April 22, 2019 . This is Defendant's fourth request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel for Defendant (Counsel) had a personal family emergency this week and was unexpecte..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion Summary Judgment be extended from April 18, 2019 to April 22, 2019. This is Defendant's fourth request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel for Defendant (Counsel) had a personal family emergency this week and was unexpectedly out of the office following the death of her uncle and two cousins. Counsel also has over 100+ active social security matters, which require two or more dispositive motions per week until mid-June. Due unexpected leave and heavy workload, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Counsel apologizes for the belated request, but made her request as soon as reasonably practicable.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: April 18, 2019 /s/ *Laura Krank
(*as authorized by email on April 18, 2019)
LAURA KRANK
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: April 18, 2019 McGREGOR W. SCOTT
Acting United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
By /s/ Tina L. Naicker
TINA L. NAICKER
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
