Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Offdenkamp v. Praxair Distribution, Inc., 1:18-cv-1666-DAD-JLT. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190423855 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION (Doc. 8) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On April 16, 2019, the parties filed a "Stipulated Request for Dismissal of Action with Prejudice," indicating Plaintiff was "dismissing all claims and all causes of action" with prejudice. (Doc. 8 at 2) "The plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing ... a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties w
More

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION

(Doc. 8)

On April 16, 2019, the parties filed a "Stipulated Request for Dismissal of Action with Prejudice," indicating Plaintiff was "dismissing all claims and all causes of action" with prejudice. (Doc. 8 at 2) "The plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing ... a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties who have appeared signed the stipulation, it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer