Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gross v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-2486-EFB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190424902 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a thirty (30) day extension of time until May 10, 2019, in which to e-file her Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on or before June 10, 2019. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's schedule of administrative hearing and district court brie
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a thirty (30) day extension of time until May 10, 2019, in which to e-file her Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on or before June 10, 2019. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's schedule of administrative hearing and district court briefs due (twelve opening briefs due). Plaintiff makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Defendant has no objection and has stipulated to the requested relief.

Dated: April 12, 2019 /s/HARVEY P. SACKETT HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff LAURA GROSS Dated: April 12, 2019 /s/DANIEL P. TALBERT DANIEL P. TALBERT Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration

IT IS ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer