Johnson v. Ramirez Limited Partnership, 2:15-cv-02304-JAM-AC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190429b03
Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment. ECF No. 14. The matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(19). A hearing on the motion was scheduled for May 8, 2019. Defendants have not responded to the motion. Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Local Rule further provides that "[n]o party will be entitled to be heard
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment. ECF No. 14. The matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(19). A hearing on the motion was scheduled for May 8, 2019. Defendants have not responded to the motion. Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Local Rule further provides that "[n]o party will be entitled to be heard ..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment. ECF No. 14. The matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(19). A hearing on the motion was scheduled for May 8, 2019. Defendants have not responded to the motion.
Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Local Rule further provides that "[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party." In addition, Local Rule 230(j) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court."
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The motion hearing date of May 8, 2019 is CONTINUED to May 22, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 26; and
2. Defendants shall file an Opposition — or a Statement of Non-Opposition — to the motion, no later than May 8, 2019. Failure to file an opposition or to appear at the hearing will be deemed a statement of non-opposition.
Source: Leagle
