Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lundgren v. Berryhill, 1:18-cv-01033-JDP. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190502c66 Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . TO THE HONORABLE JEREMY D. PETERSON, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time in which plaintiff must file his opening brief for a period of 28 days from April 19, 2019, to and including May 17, 2019, and that all subsequent deadlines set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order, Doc. No. 5, are extended acc
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

TO THE HONORABLE JEREMY D. PETERSON, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT:

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time in which plaintiff must file his opening brief for a period of 28 days from April 19, 2019, to and including May 17, 2019, and that all subsequent deadlines set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order, Doc. No. 5, are extended accordingly.

This is the parties' first request for an extension in this matter. This request is made pursuant to paragraph 12 of the Scheduling Order, permitting a 30-day extension by stipulation of the parties.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Approved and so ordered:

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer