Filed: May 01, 2019
Latest Update: May 01, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUE THE STATUS HEARING TO JUNE 18, 2019 JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, through its undersigned counsel, and defendant Wilfred W. Bryant, through his respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows: 1. This matter is currently set for a hearing on Mr. Bryant's motions to suppress evidence on May 7, 2019. (Dkt. No. 34.) Bryant filed his motion on April 2, 2019. ( Id. ) 2. By this stipula
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUE THE STATUS HEARING TO JUNE 18, 2019 JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, through its undersigned counsel, and defendant Wilfred W. Bryant, through his respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows: 1. This matter is currently set for a hearing on Mr. Bryant's motions to suppress evidence on May 7, 2019. (Dkt. No. 34.) Bryant filed his motion on April 2, 2019. ( Id. ) 2. By this stipulat..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUE THE STATUS HEARING TO JUNE 18, 2019
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America, through its undersigned counsel, and defendant Wilfred W. Bryant, through his respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows:
1. This matter is currently set for a hearing on Mr. Bryant's motions to suppress evidence on May 7, 2019. (Dkt. No. 34.) Bryant filed his motion on April 2, 2019. (Id.)
2. By this stipulation, the parties now seek to modify the briefing schedule as set forth below. As good cause for granting this request, government counsel avers that the government requires a brief period of additional time to communicate with personnel from the Vacaville Police Department in regards to the government's opposition. In addition, government counsel has relayed a plea offer to the defense contemporaneous with this filing. Defense counsel will require a brief period of time to review the offer and discuss it with Mr. Bryant.
3. By this stipulation, the parties jointly request that the Court modify the briefing schedule as follows:
a. United States' Opposition — due June 4, 2019
b. Defendant's Reply — due June 11, 2019
c. Motion hearing, if necessary — June 18, 2019
4. This matter is currently set for a status hearing on May 7, 2019, and time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq., has already been excluded through that date. (Dkt. No. 33.) By this stipulation, the parties jointly agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including June 18, 2019, under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D) and Local Code E [pretrial motions, from filing to hearing or prompt disposition].
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
The Court has read and considered the parties' Stipulation and (Proposed) Order to Modify the Briefing Schedule and Continue the Status Hearing to June 18, 2019, filed May 1, 2019. The Court finds that the Stipulation, which the Court incorporates by reference into this Order, establishes good cause for a modification of the briefing schedule. The Court further finds that the brief extension of time requested by the parties would not adversely affect the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases.
THEREFORE, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN:
1. The briefing schedule on the defendant's motions to suppress evidence is modified as follows:
a. United States' Opposition — due June 4, 2019
b. Defendant's Reply — due June 11, 2019
c. Motion hearing, if necessary — June 18, 2019
2. The Court further orders that the May 7, 2019 status hearing be continued to June 18, 2019 at 9:15 a.m.
3. The Court further orders that time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq., be excluded from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including June 18, 2019, under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D) and Local Code E [pretrial motions, from filing to hearing or prompt disposition].
SO ORDERED.
