Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mastel v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02390-KJN. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190503d05 Visitors: 17
Filed: May 02, 2019
Latest Update: May 02, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1920 KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . TO THE HONORABLE KENDALL J. NEWMAN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Ernest Mastel be awarded attorney fees in the amount of Fi
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920

TO THE HONORABLE KENDALL J. NEWMAN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Ernest Mastel be awarded attorney fees in the amount of Five Thousand dollars ($5,000.00) and expenses in the amount of zero dollars ($0.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of zero dollars ($0.00) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Ernest Mastel, the government will consider the matter of Ernest Mastel's assignment of EAJA fees to Laura E. Krank. The retainer agreement containing the assignment is attached as exhibit 1. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Ernest Mastel, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Ernest Mastel does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Law Offices of Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP, pursuant to the assignment executed by Ernest Mastel.1 Any payments made shall be delivered to Laura E. Krank.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Ernest Mastel's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Ernest Mastel and/or Laura E. Krank including Law Offices of Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Laura E. Krank and/or the Law Offices of Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

DATE: April 19, 2019 Respectfully submitted, ROHLFING & KALAGIAN, LLP BY: Laura E. Krank Attorney for plaintiff Ernest Mastel DATED: April 19, 2019 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DANIEL P. TALBERT Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization)

ORDER

Approved and so ordered.

FootNotes


1. The parties do not stipulate whether counsel for the plaintiff has a cognizable lien under federal law against the recovery of EAJA fees that survives the Treasury Offset Program.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer