Filed: May 14, 2019
Latest Update: May 14, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for sentencing on June 10, 2019. 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the June 10, 2019 hearing to October 28, 2019. 3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for sentencing on June 10, 2019. 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the June 10, 2019 hearing to October 28, 2019. 3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court ..
More
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for sentencing on June 10, 2019.
2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the June 10, 2019 hearing to October 28, 2019.
3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:
a) Counsel for defendant desires additional time to consult with his client, review the current documents, conduct investigation and prepare himself and his client for the sentencing hearing.
b) Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny him/her the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
c) Defendant is currently on pre-trial release, attending school, and has not had any issues/violations while on pre-trial release.
d) The government does not object to the continuance.
4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: May 14, 2019 McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
/s/ JEFFREY A. SPIVAK
JEFFREY A. SPIVAK
Assistant United States Attorney
Dated: May 14, 2019 /s/ PETER JONES
PETER JONES
Counsel for Defendant
NORMAN EASON
(as approved by email 5/14/2019)
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
