Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Speropoulos, 2:19-mj-00019-EFB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190515c86 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 13, 2019
Latest Update: May 13, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO RULE 5.1(d) AND EXCLUSION OF TIME ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its attorney of record, Assistant United States Attorney Grant Rabenn, and defendants Xavier Alexander Speropoulos and Lauren Crowe, both individually and by and through their respective counsel of record, Christina Sinha and Todd Leras, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The Co
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO RULE 5.1(d) AND EXCLUSION OF TIME

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its attorney of record, Assistant United States Attorney Grant Rabenn, and defendants Xavier Alexander Speropoulos and Lauren Crowe, both individually and by and through their respective counsel of record, Christina Sinha and Todd Leras, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. The Complaint in this matter was filed on January 18, 2019.

2. By prior stipulation, the parties jointly moved for an extension of the preliminary hearing to May 13, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. pursuant to Rule 5.1(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

3. The parties now jointly move for a further extension of time for the preliminary hearing to June 10, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. before the duty Magistrate Judge pursuant to F.R.C.P. 5.1(d). The parties stipulate that there is good cause for the delay, as it is required to allow the defense reasonable time for the preparation and review of discovery and for the government's continued investigation of the case. The parties further agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, and respectfully request the Court so to find.

Respectfully submitted, HEATHER E. WILLIAMS Federal Defender Date: May 13, 2019 /s/Christina Sinha CHRISTINA SINHA Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys for Defendant Xavier Speropoulos Dated: May 13, 2019 /s/Todd Leras TODD LERAS Attorney for Defendant Lauren Crowe Dated: May 13, 2019 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney /s/Grant B. Rabenn GRANT B. RABENN Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having received and considered the parties' stipulation for an extension of time filed on May 13, 2019, finds that the stipulation demonstrates good cause for an extension of the preliminary hearing date pursuant to Rule 5.1(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Furthermore, for the reasons set forth in the parties' stipulation, the Court finds that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The Court further finds that the extension of time would not adversely affect the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases. Therefore, the Court orders that the date of the preliminary hearing is extended to June 10, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. before the duty Magistrate Judge, and time between May 13, 2019 and June 10, 2019 shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer