Anderson v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-02809-AC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190516882
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 14, 2019
Latest Update: May 14, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended from May 13, 2019 to June 20, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel was out of the office last month following the death of her two cousins, and uncle. As a result, Counsel attended funeral and prayer ser
Summary: STIPULATION ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended from May 13, 2019 to June 20, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel was out of the office last month following the death of her two cousins, and uncle. As a result, Counsel attended funeral and prayer serv..
More
STIPULATION
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended from May 13, 2019 to June 20, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel was out of the office last month following the death of her two cousins, and uncle. As a result, Counsel attended funeral and prayer services and took care of her elderly mother, who became ill. Good cause also exits as Counsel also has over 100+ active social security matters, which require two or more dispositive motions per week until mid-July. Due to heavy caseload and unexpected leave, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Counsel apologizes for the belated request, but made her request as soon as reasonably practicable, as she has been on sick/personal leave. Respectfully submitted,
Dated: My 13, 2019 /s/ * John V. Johnson
(*as authorized by email on May 13, 2019)
JOHN V. JOHNSON
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: May 13, 2019. McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
By /s/Tina L.
Naicker
TINA L. NAICKER
Special
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
