Ramos v. Berryhill, 2:18cv00060-DMC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190516897
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 15, 2019
Latest Update: May 15, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended by 30 days, from May 9, 2019, to Monday, June 10, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because Defendant's
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended by 30 days, from May 9, 2019, to Monday, June 10, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because Defendant's ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended by 30 days, from May 9, 2019, to Monday, June 10, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because Defendant's counsel has multiple briefs due within the next three weeks and will be out of the office for eight days. Counsel for Defendant has conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, who consents to the request. The parties further stipulate that all subsequent dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
Counsel for Defendant apologizes to the Court for any inconvenience caused by this delay.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: May 9, 2019 /s/ Harvey P. Sackett
(*as authorized via email on May 8, 2019)
HARVEY P. SACKETT
Attorney for Plaintiff
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
By: /s/ Carol S. Clark
CAROL S. CLARK
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED NUNC PRO TUNC TO MAY 9, 2019.
Source: Leagle
