Smith v. Berryhill, 1:18-cv-01614-GSA. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190521998
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 20, 2019
Latest Update: May 20, 2019
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Plaintiff shall have a 30-day extension of time, from May 6, 2019 to June 5, 2019, for Plaintiff to serve on defendant with PLAINTIFF'S LETTER BRIEF. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extensio
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Plaintiff shall have a 30-day extension of time, from May 6, 2019 to June 5, 2019, for Plaintiff to serve on defendant with PLAINTIFF'S LETTER BRIEF. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension..
More
AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Plaintiff shall have a 30-day extension of time, from May 6, 2019 to June 5, 2019, for Plaintiff to serve on defendant with PLAINTIFF'S LETTER BRIEF. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.
This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Plaintiff respectfully states that the requested extension is necessary due several merit briefs being due on the same week. Counsel requires additional time to brief the issues thoroughly for the Court's consideration. Defendant does not oppose the requested extension. Counsel apologizes to the Defendant and Court for any inconvenience this may cause.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: April 30, 2019 PENA & BROMBERG, ATTORNEYS AT LAW
By: /s/ Jonathan Omar Pena
JONATHAN OMAR PENA
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Dated: May 1, 2019. MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
By: /s/
Carol S. Clark
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
(*As authorized by email on May 1, 2019)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
