Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Martinez v. City of Stockton, 2:18-cv-00964-TLN-AC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190521a48 Visitors: 14
Filed: May 20, 2019
Latest Update: May 20, 2019
Summary: PROTECTIVE ORDER RE PRODUCTION PURSUANT TO SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ISSUED 4/24/19 ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Upon the stipulation filed by Plaintiff and non-party California Department of Justice and good cause appearing therefor, the California Department of Justice shall produce the items sought by subpoena duces tecum issued April 24, 2019 (production date 5/10/19) and issued by Plaintiff's counsel), except that the production shall be subject to a protective order under the foll
More

PROTECTIVE ORDER RE PRODUCTION PURSUANT TO SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ISSUED 4/24/19

Upon the stipulation filed by Plaintiff and non-party California Department of Justice and good cause appearing therefor, the California Department of Justice shall produce the items sought by subpoena duces tecum issued April 24, 2019 (production date 5/10/19) and issued by Plaintiff's counsel), except that the production shall be subject to a protective order under the following terms:

1. To the extent subpoenaed items pertain to an individual who is NOT the Plaintiff, the items may only be disclosed to the Court hearing this matter, the parties' attorneys, investigators and/or consultants or experts, and representatives, in this lawsuit, for defendant the City of Stockton. The items, however, shall not be disclosed to Plaintiff (unless the item(s) pertain(s) to Plaintiff and not another individual); 2. If any party wishes to disclose the subpoenaed items, or any portion thereof to any person other than those listed in Paragraph 1, that party shall give written notice by mail and email to counsel for the California Department of Justice so that the Department can make a motion to prevent the disclosure. The notice shall inform the Department to whom disclosure is requested and the purpose thereof. The party wishing to disclose the information will not to do so unless and until agreement with the Department is reached, or the Department's motion is ruled on by the court. If, however, the Department, does not file its motion within two weeks of the notice, the party wishing to disclose the information may deem the issue to have been abandoned. 3. This Order makes no finding of the relevancy, if any, of the subpoenaed items to the proof of claims and/or defenses asserted by any party in this case.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer