Farmer v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., 1:19-cv-00413-DAD-BAM. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190522867
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 20, 2019
Latest Update: May 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL COMPLAINT (Doc. No. 11.) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On May 16, 2019, the parties filed a second joint stipulation to extend time for defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. to answer plaintiff's complaint. (Doc. No. 11.) Good cause appearing and the parties having so stipulated, it is hereby ordered that defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. shall
Summary: ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL COMPLAINT (Doc. No. 11.) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On May 16, 2019, the parties filed a second joint stipulation to extend time for defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. to answer plaintiff's complaint. (Doc. No. 11.) Good cause appearing and the parties having so stipulated, it is hereby ordered that defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. shall h..
More
ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL COMPLAINT
(Doc. No. 11.)
DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.
On May 16, 2019, the parties filed a second joint stipulation to extend time for defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. to answer plaintiff's complaint. (Doc. No. 11.) Good cause appearing and the parties having so stipulated, it is hereby ordered that defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. shall have until June 21, 2019 to answer plaintiff's complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
