Filed: May 22, 2019
Latest Update: May 22, 2019
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER STIPULATION GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on May 24, 2019. 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until July 12, 20
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER STIPULATION GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on May 24, 2019. 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until July 12, 201..
More
AMENDED STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER
STIPULATION
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on May 24, 2019.
2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until July 12, 2019, and to exclude time between May 24, 2019, and July 12, 2019, under Local Code T4.
3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:
a) The government has represented that the discovery associated with this case includes several hundred pages of reports and other documents, audio files and video footage. All of this discovery has been either produced directly to counsel and/or made available for inspection and copying.
b) Counsel for defendant desires additional time to finish reviewing the discovery, to consult with her client, to analyze the current charge, and to discuss potential resolutions with her client.
c) Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny her the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
d) The government does not object to the continuance.
e) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
f) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of May 24, 2019 to July 12, 2019, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: May 20, 2019 McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
/s/ROSANNE L. RUST
ROSANNE L. RUST
Assistant United States Attorney
Dated: May 20, 2019. /s/CANDICE FIELDS
CANDICE FIELDS
Counsel for Defendant
Damanpreet Singh
FINDINGS AND ORDER
IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.
