Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Valencia, 1:15-cr-00300-DAD-BAM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190529b28 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 26, 2019
Latest Update: May 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION (Doc. No. 164) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On September 25, 2017, defendant Valencia was sentenced to 70 months in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons following his plea of guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. 846 and 841(a)(1) as alleged in a Superseding Information. On May 20, 2019 defendant Victor Valencia, proceeding pro se, filed with this court an "Emergenc
More

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

(Doc. No. 164)

On September 25, 2017, defendant Valencia was sentenced to 70 months in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons following his plea of guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1) as alleged in a Superseding Information. On May 20, 2019 defendant Victor Valencia, proceeding pro se, filed with this court an "Emergency Motion For Sentence Reduction based upon his good behavior while imprisoned, his rehabilitative efforts and accomplishments since being sentenced and his mother's serious medical condition. (Doc. No. 164.) Because the court lacks jurisdiction to grant defendant the requested relief his motion will be denied.

The court acknowledges defendant Valencia's efforts and accomplishments since his incarceration as reflected in the various attachments to his motion. However, ordinarily a district court "may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed." United States v. Mercado-Moreno, 869 F.3d 942, 948 (9th Cir. 2017) (citing 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)). One exception, in addition to those addressed in §3582(c) itself, to this general rule is when relief is authorized by Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. That rule sets forth two circumstances in which a district court may modify a sentence. Under Rule 35(a) a court may correct a sentence within 14 days of sentencing for an arithmetical, technical, or other clear error. Pursuant to Rule 35(b) a district court may reduce a sentence based upon a defendant's substantial assistance in the government's investigation or prosecution of another. However, these exceptions are inapplicable to defendant Valencia's pending motion. This court simply lacks the authority to modify or reduce his sentence due to post-sentencing rehabilitation or family circumstances.

For the reasons stated above, defendant's Emergency Motion For Sentence Reduction (Doc. No. 164) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer