North v. TransUnion, LLC, 2:19-cv-00783-KJM-KJN. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190603656
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 30, 2019
Latest Update: May 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO THE INITIAL COMPLAINT KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . ORDER Having considered the stipulation filed jointly by Plaintiff Dayna North ("Plaintiff") and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") to extend the time for Chase to respond to the initial Complaint, and for good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Parties' Stipulation is GRANTED. 2. Chase shall file a r
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO THE INITIAL COMPLAINT KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . ORDER Having considered the stipulation filed jointly by Plaintiff Dayna North ("Plaintiff") and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") to extend the time for Chase to respond to the initial Complaint, and for good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Parties' Stipulation is GRANTED. 2. Chase shall file a re..
More
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO THE INITIAL COMPLAINT
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
ORDER
Having considered the stipulation filed jointly by Plaintiff Dayna North ("Plaintiff") and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") to extend the time for Chase to respond to the initial Complaint, and for good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Parties' Stipulation is GRANTED.
2. Chase shall file a responsive pleading to the initial Complaint by June 24, 2019.
Source: Leagle
