Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wongsavanh v. Berryhill, 1:18-cv-01401-JDP. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190606d25 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Plaintiff shall have a 30-day extension of time, from May 31, 2019 to July 1, 2019, for Plaintiff to serve on defendant with PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Plaintiff shall have a 30-day extension of time, from May 31, 2019 to July 1, 2019, for Plaintiff to serve on defendant with PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.

This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Plaintiff respectfully states that the requested extension is necessary due several merit briefs being due on the same week. Counsel requires additional time to brief the issues thoroughly for the Court's consideration. Defendant does not oppose the requested extension. Counsel apologizes to the Defendant and Court for any inconvenience this may cause.

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer