Geray v. Shafer, 2:18-CV-2787-KJM-DMC-P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190606e84
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for an independent mental examination (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff's motion is denied as premature because no answer to plaintiff's complaint has been filed and, as such, the case is not yet at issue. Upon the filing of an answer, the court will set a schedule for this case after which the parties may condu
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for an independent mental examination (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff's motion is denied as premature because no answer to plaintiff's complaint has been filed and, as such, the case is not yet at issue. Upon the filing of an answer, the court will set a schedule for this case after which the parties may conduc..
More
ORDER
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for an independent mental examination (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff's motion is denied as premature because no answer to plaintiff's complaint has been filed and, as such, the case is not yet at issue. Upon the filing of an answer, the court will set a schedule for this case after which the parties may conduct discovery and plaintiff may renew his motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
